Insurance restrictions and lack of real-time data are undermining efforts to fix the HGV driver shortage, according to new analysis from the Logistics Skills Network and Fueler Consulting. The report warns that without addressing these structural issues, training investment risks repeating past failures.

The Logistics Skills Network and Fueler Consulting have been co-operating and sharing intelligence to take a comprehensive look at the UK HGV driver market.
Where it’s been, where it is, and where it’s heading. The response to the report has been stronger than expected.
Not because it’s sensational, but because it reflects what people across training, haulage, drivers and recruitment are already living with every day.
A system that still doesn’t quite join up. The big debate running through the report is a familiar one. Who pays for training, and how should it be delivered?
That conversation hasn’t gone away. But before we get back there, two more immediate problems are sitting in the way. Until these get addressed, the rest will always remain seriously challenged.
The first is insurance
This came up in almost every conversation after the report dropped. Providers, hauliers, drivers, recruiters, all saying the same thing. Insurance isn’t just part of the problem. In a lot of ways, it’s shaping the whole market.
Barriers for newly qualified drivers, experience-based restrictions, the cost of risk, these are influencing hiring decisions before a driver ever reaches a job. It affects whether someone bothers to train in the first place, and whether an employer can realistically take them on when they do. It’s not a side issue.
The second is data
We’re still operating largely blind. No clear real-time picture of how many newly qualified drivers are coming through.
No reliable split between employer-funded and self-funded training. And no proper understanding of how many people qualify but never find work, especially from the earlier bootcamp cohorts. Little data on missed deliveries and a trusted source of driver demand / job vacancies and retiree numbers. Anything we do have lags at least one year behind.
Without that visibility, the market can’t respond properly. Training providers are working without clear signals. Hauliers are making decisions under cost and risk pressure. Recruitment is left trying to bridge a gap that’s fundamentally structural.
There are early signs the market is beginning to move again, something the report gets into. But that makes the question more urgent, not less.
If we can’t sort the insurance barrier, and we’re still guessing on the data, how do we expect employers, government or individuals to invest confidently in the next phase of the driver pipeline?
The attempts at reform over the past decade haven’t been nothing. Some things have shifted. But not enough. And without proper alignment across these core issues, we risk running the same cycle again, training drivers into a system that still can’t absorb them properly.
The conversation needs to move. Not just around funding, but around the structural stuff behind it.
David Coombes, chair, Logistics Skills Network
Marc Fels, founder, Fueler Consulting










